In "Song of
Myself," I find perception to be one of the most interesting motifs. Of course, this is not a literal motif, but I like the way that it is present throughout the poem, and the poem relies on it (In a symbiotic relationship.) The theme
itself is loaded with tangential meaning and Whitman effectively frames his
poem through multiple perceptions. Certain verses exhibit a specific type of character who has a specific outlook; all views work together.The four that I found most interesting were
through the perception of a child, an outsider, the assumed narrator and the
relationship between author and reader.
“A child
said What is the grass? fetching it to me with full hands;
How could I
answer the child? I do not know what it is any more
than he.”
(I know the grass is hackneyed, but I mean for the child to be of focus, not the grass.)
A child asks daddy Walt a question that reeks of simplicity, but upon consideration, the question becomes extremely complicated. We can break down our language system in a way that creates more meaning than just the superficial meaning. A child may be asking something as simple as “what is the grass” to an adult, who will begin to think theoretically- “well what IS the grass?” Whitman knows just as much as the child, he only has more experience than the child. He uses this perception as a process- a child is learning constantly- discovering the things that we (as adults) find obvious. This process is breaking through the walls of naivety/ignorance in order to step into the depressing reality of “knowing.” Learning is a process and so is Song of Myself (the poem will educate you – provide you with tools) The child is the child inside of us- the spirit that reminds us to loaf around with our clothes off and forget (for a moment) our reality (to live in newness).
A child asks daddy Walt a question that reeks of simplicity, but upon consideration, the question becomes extremely complicated. We can break down our language system in a way that creates more meaning than just the superficial meaning. A child may be asking something as simple as “what is the grass” to an adult, who will begin to think theoretically- “well what IS the grass?” Whitman knows just as much as the child, he only has more experience than the child. He uses this perception as a process- a child is learning constantly- discovering the things that we (as adults) find obvious. This process is breaking through the walls of naivety/ignorance in order to step into the depressing reality of “knowing.” Learning is a process and so is Song of Myself (the poem will educate you – provide you with tools) The child is the child inside of us- the spirit that reminds us to loaf around with our clothes off and forget (for a moment) our reality (to live in newness).
“Stop this
day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of
all poems,
You shall possess the good of the earth and sun, (there are millions
of suns
left,) You shall no longer take things at second or third hand, nor look
through the
eyes of the dead, nor feed on the spectres in books,
You shall
not look through my eyes either, nor take things from me,
You shall
listen to all sides and filter them from your self.”
As a reader, we are bringing our
own perception to the poem; we become part of the meaning of the poem. Our life
experiences and knowledge becomes the lens for which we interpret the poem. How
we understand the poem is just as important as the words on the page. The
perception of the reader and author make the poem more than a piece of paper;
it becomes a breathing organism. We breathe into the mouth of Walt, like CPR
(and it’s hella sexy.) As opposed to the idea that the author is privileged and
on a pedestal, Whitman is letting the reader blend with the author; authority
is not an issue. Whitman perverts the normal relationship between reader and
author – a power relationship that is seen in most writing. Rather than make
proclamations, he wants to know the reader’s perspective; he wants the reader
to learn from his poem. He doesn’t want the reader to take what Walt says as
the sole truth, but use what one has learned to develop one’s own truth. The
poem changes with every reader- with all of their experiences influencing their
perspective- a perspective of multitudes.
“Dancing and
laughing along the beach came the twenty-ninth
bather”
The woman
watching the bathers is an outsider. For one, she is the only woman around a
group of men and secondly she is stuck inside watching the men enjoy themselves
from a distance. Ironically the outsider is inside the house while the men are
“outside” it, yet are “in.” She is watching them through a filter, literally.
The windowpane is between her and the outside world, presenting her with a
false clarity- allowing her to fall into her daydream. Although the window is
clear, it is a thick and impenetrable boundary between her and the bathers. The bathers all look
as if they are having a great time, but they are still lonely: “Twenty-eight
years of womanly life and all so lonesome.” The woman may understand that they
are lonely, but at the moment, they are enjoying the flesh of another - a temporary
medication for their loneliness. The woman is a voyeur to their fleshy
adventures and imagines herself joining them as the 29th bather. The
voyeur (outsider) represents the voyeuristic reader. We read into pieces of
writing without the author knowing (specifically they don’t know who is
reading/the writer is probably dead), gazing upon something that is not ours.
“Do I
contradict myself?
Very well
then I contradict myself,
(I am large,
I contain multitudes.)”
As readers,
we must never assume that the narrator is the author. The narrator asks “Do I
contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain
multitudes.)” The poem is full of contradictions and is in no way a
representation of one truth. A human being is not in complete agreement with
all the currents inside him/her; we are full of contradictions and Whitman
accepts that – more than accepts it, he embraces it. Contradictions are a part
of the human condition, just as “Song of Myself” exhibits. Whitman is everyman
and everywoman. As Whitman suggests, we all contain multitudes. So what is the
perception of Whitman? I don’t think we need to know – it would defeat the
purpose. His poem is not gearing up as a means to an end, the process – the
life of the poem is what is important. Meaning is arbitrary; it is the
experience that matters. The perception of the narrator is one of
contradictions, which would usually result in readers deeming him as an
“unreliable narrator.” I don’t see Whitman as an unreliable narrator; I see him
as representing the unreliability and complexities in humanity, making him
anything but unreliable (actually very reliable in a sense).
By using perception as a motif,
Whitman develops different ways to look at the poem. There are many different lenses in this poem, all representing certain themes. A child represents a
perception of naivety laced with insight. The outsider – the voyeur – mimics
the position of the reader. As readers, we can virtually be a part of the
written events, but we are not actually participating, just as a voyeur. The
relationship between the author and the reader provides a perception that
defies the “norm.” Perception is not limited to what Whitman writes for it also
relies on the perception of the reader, adding a layer of meaning that is
unique to the individual. The perception of the author represents the persona
an author wears which does not make it the author’s reality. By doing this,
Whitman is displaying humanity in a broad sense. “Song of Myself” is a vivarium
of different perceptions and essentially a depiction of life.
OMG, you discovered the Whitman Cosmo cover!
ReplyDeleteI like the way you're starting to unpack the dynamics of W's "processual" poetics - - e.g. the way in which all stable, unitary objects and subjects are made active and interactive . . . . the poem becomes a performance (even a dialogue) rather than a representation . . .